Re: State of KPlato?

Dag Andersen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.kplato
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tirsdag 26 oktober 2004 21:54, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the current state of KPlato? Is it desired to improve it?
Well, I think so :)
> .... Hmm.. just skimmed through the KPlato docs... it seems some
> people have already thought about what should be implemented, how
> far is it?
In short, you can currently do:
- Define tasks (incl. summarytasks, milestones), resources, calendars.
- Assign calendars to resources.
- Allocate resources to tasks.
- Link tasks.
- Have the project calculated.
- Presentation mainly in ganttchart using KDGantt.
  There is also a network diagram and a resourceview,
  but they are rudimentary and mostly for testing.

Doesn't sound to bad, eh?
Well, what's not so good, missing?
- The dialogs are not good (understatement).
- Command history only partially implemented.
- There are some holes in the calculation.
- Calendar stuff not complete.
- No resource leveling.
- more...

I'm currently working on link handling in KDGantt, mainly implementing
linktypes (FinishStart, FinishFinish, StartStart). When that's done 
(today, I hope), I'm planning:
- Implement task linking from KDGantt in kplato. (most code finished)
- Have a look at the project calculations again.
- Go through the dialogs and see if I can patch up the worst things.
- Implement missing command history.
- hmmmm
>
> And what about ... for example Mr. Project?
Don't know how far they have come. No room to run gnome on my 
computer :(
(By the way, there is also TaskJuggler)
>
> Any thoughts on the subject?
The dialog approach to data entering is not always optimal. I've been 
thinking of implementing most of the dialog stuff in a 'structured 
editor' based on QListView. I've found that to be (almost) 
impossible, so personally I decided to postpone that until Qt4, which 
AFAICS offers more flexibility in this respect. 
> Raphael

-- 
Mvh,
Dag Andersen
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.