Re: request
Mark Tombs <[email protected]> Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:14:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kplato |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 31 October 2004 11.22, Dag Andersen wrote: > On Fredag 29 oktober 2004 20:35, Mark Tombs wrote: > > Hi list > > > > I have a request for kplato functionality. Can it please, please, > > please not auto-schedule the way MS Project does, or at least make > > it optional? Its the most annoying thing. If I have an > > I think optional. > > > over-allocation or whatever, I prefer to be told about it and > > decide myself what to do, rather than have my tasks shifting all > > over the place. > > To be able to find out if there is conflicts the project needs to be > scheduled, no? Of course, but it doesn't need to be automatically scheduled for me. I am capable of entering my own task durations (which doesn't have to be work * resources, like MSProject insists.) I want to be in control of my project plan, is all. I should be able to over-allocate resources if I want to :) An auto-schedule function should definitely exist, but in my opinion it should be something I request, then it happens, then my plan is left alone, if you understand what I mean. > > Hmm, maybe if we define a 'schedule only new task'-mode of calculation > that effectively freezes existing tasks. > So, if linked to existing tasks the new task will be scheduled in > accordance with these but the old tasks will not be rescheduled. > If there is enough float and resources it's ok, else conflicts are > reported. > What do say? > > > Don't know what the plans are re this, but thought I'd get in > > early... > > > > thanks > > > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > > kplato mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kplato