Re: koffice/kplato
Dag Andersen <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Nov 2004 07:35:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kplato |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Onsdag 03 november 2004 23:03, Raphael Langerhorst wrote: > CVS commit by raphael: (snip) > > some forms have no assoziated .ui file (the generated files are > used) but have no appropriate file header either (still the default > from uic) They should probably have a proper header for now. I originally built these with designer but I had to manually modify stuff so I decided to ditch the ui files. I think the main problem was I use a modified KDatePicker dialog which designer doesn't know about. I'll have a look at it again. > > defs.h was moved into the namespace as well > kptcalendar.h: fixed bug for setParentId (the ID never got set > because it was == instead of =) Personally I think defs.h should go, the enum defined there should go into (KPT)Releation. > > main.cc: KCmdLineOptions options[]... was put into the namespace, > kdemain itself NOT. kptaboutdata.h: was also put into the > namespace. > > remaining tasks for finalizing the namespace: > rename classes (remove the KPT prefix) > rename files (remove the kpt prefix) > what about kptfactory??? > move forms into the KPlato namespace > > Dag Anderson: please test the app if all still behaves as you > expect, since you know KPlato much better. I basically tested it > and it worked, I also didn't get any s trange debugging output. Will do. > -- Mvh, Dag Andersen