Re: Duration less than a day? (was: request)
Mark Tombs <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:27:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kplato |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 04 November 2004 09.23, Dag Andersen wrote: > On Onsdag 03 november 2004 21:56, Claus Agerskov wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Mark Tombs wrote: > > > Can the duration be less than a day? Claus wrote : > > > > > > "Duration is the calendar time of a task." > > > > > > If a task starts and finishes on the same day, it has a duration > > > of 1. > > How do you handle tasks with estimates that isn't multiple of days? > In general, how do you calculate a project like this? > Thats where I think I and, it seems, the rest of the world have a different terminology ;) For me, Duration != work. The hours, estimate, work, whatever you call it, is seperate from the duration. A task can start and finish on the same day, have duration of 1, but an estimate of 1 minute, if you like. Now that I write it like that, it doesn't seem to make much sense, but its how I've always worked. Maybe I should just be quiet now, as everyone else seems to disagree with me. > > Or? > > > > Duration is the time period from start timestamp to the end > > timestamp and can be measured in the time unit you want. > > That's how I see it, too. > > > In some projects minutes can be crucial but in others months or - > > years even - are usable units for duration. > > > > Personal I would have the duration saved in seconds so I can choose > > the time unit I want when I will see the duration. > > It's saved in milliseconds, in a 64 bit int. > > > The most enjoyable greetings