Re: Fwd: RE: license and patent issues with PMXML

If it covers the requirements, why not.

my 2p.

/mark

On Friday 05 November 2004 20.10, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> Now, what do you think about using the PMXML Schema for our file
> format?
> Raphael
>
> ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>
> Subject: RE: license and patent issues with PMXML
> Date: Friday 05 November 2004 20:03
> From: "Michael Lester" <[email protected]>
> To: "Raphael Langerhorst" <[email protected]>
>
> I apologize for the slow reply.  The PMXML format is open to anyone
>  that wants to use it, so feel free to use it your projects.  I don't
>  know of a reason why it can not be used with Kplato.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphael Langerhorst [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:47 AM
> To: Michael Lester
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: license and patent issues with PMXML
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm involved in development of the KPlato (K PLanning TOol,
> http://www.koffice.org/kplato) application. Currently we use our own
> (XML) format for storing documents. As KPlato has not yet been
>  released changing the format is not affecting users.
>
> We consider PMXML as an option. We have a few questions though:
>
> 1) What is the license of the PMXML format? Can it be freely used by
> open source projects like KPlato?
>
> 2) Are there any patents we need to be aware of when using the
>  format?
>
> 3) How far is the standardization process?
>
> You can also answer directly to the [email protected] mailing list.
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Raphael Langerhorst
>
> --
> G System, The Evolving Universe - http://www.g-system.at
>
> -------------------------------------------------------