Re: Fwd: RE: license and patent issues with PMXML
Dag Andersen <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:34:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kplato |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mandag 08 november 2004 22:39, Raphael Langerhorst wrote: > On Monday 08 November 2004 19:39, Mark Tombs wrote: > > On Monday 08 November 2004 17.15, [email protected] > > wrote: > > [...] > > I'm not very familiar with any project management software (ok, a > little bit of Mr. Project with 0.9 version, but nothing serious). > So I'm also not very familiar with requirements to file formats. > But reading the posts here it seems to me that the format is > somewhat a bit restricted. > > I see 2 possible solutions to this (or 3): > > a) contact these people to improve PMXML IMVHO, I think they probably have met their objective, to enable data exchange between PMs. They didn't intend to save *all* data needed to recalculate. It doesn't mean extending it is out of the question, though. > > b) create own (OASIS??) standard or find another standard we can > use Personally I would have liked this better, but it is of course a lot of work. Anyone? > > c) stick to what we have now Well, I think this is what's going to happen, short term, at least. > > > Regards, > Raphael -- Mvh, Dag Andersen