Re: [Planner Dev] Planner maintainership
Dag Andersen <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:21:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kplato |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fredag 21 oktober 2005 15:02, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Friday 21 October 2005 09:47, Dag Andersen wrote: > > > So, I would be open to discuss merging of any (open source) > > > project management applications and would be very happy if > > > human resources could be brought together. > > > > Just for the record, I'm not against merging KPlato with > > TaskJuggler, but as you noted above Raphael, the approach is very > > different, so imho it won't be a piece of cake to do, especially > > before release of 1.5. > > I'm a bit weary of trying a merge. Initially it looks nice but > unless we intend to just cannibalize TJ for cool code any result we > get from a merge will either make us or the TJ people extremely > unhappy. > > The thing is; the reason KPlato is in KOffice is because we wanted > to make data from kspread/kexi available to KPlato. Think resources > being updated while you enter some numbers in your spreadsheet. > On the output side KPlato can use KChart (which can be extended if > needed) and use those charts in a presenter or KWord doc. Are there any thoughts on *how* data transfer should be implemented? It would be nice for instance, to be able to harvest data from kplato project(s) and/or kexi database(s) into kspread for further processing, or instead of using QListView/QTable with fixed/preprocessed data, embed kspread giving the user a possibility to tailor dataprocessing/presentation. > > Or, in other words, a planner tool in and of itself is kind of > useless; you have to provide data to it and use the date coming out > of it. Corporation with other people simply needs that. > This is where KPlato will shine as KOffice will provide a whole > workflow instead of an app to get your data out of. > > Back to taskjuggler; their approach is very different from the one > I described above. The GUI on top of TJ also does not even try to > follow the workflow options KOffice can offer. > This leads me to conclude that merging will result in a very weird > monstrosity that neither the koffice people nor the TJ people will > appreciate. > > Naturally; if the TJ people can subscribe to the KOffice point of > view; great! I'm just not holding my breath :) > > > A note on TaskJugglers fileformat: It's designed to easily be > > read/edited by humans (it's really their user interface) so > > imvvho I don't think they will ever have a native XML based > > format. (But maybe a conversion tool?) > > Yeah; the creation of a good and common file format would be the > major thing to do right now. I'm sure that the TJ people would be > able to read and write to any xml-based fileformat we come up with > (as long as its extendible) via some converter or filter plugin to > TJ. > > Cheers! -- Mvh, Dag Andersen