Re: Hello
Dag Andersen <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:30:34 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kplato |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Torsdag 09 november 2006 18:34 skrev Kevin Ottens: > Le Lundi 6 Novembre 2006 14:26, Dag Andersen a écrit : > > Lørdag 04 november 2006 12:55 skrev Nicolas MICAS: > > Could you give me an idea of your criteria for selecting things to do, I > > would be in a better position to propose things that's not on your list. > > Actually I'd be interest in seeing those criteria explained too. :-) > > > > - Start-to-finish relation. > > > > Not the most used type of dependency, but nice to have for completeness. > > > > Prio: 1 > > I'm wondering about this one. I'm not 100% about the semantic of this > dependency. Could someone enlighten me? task1 <--- task2. means task2 has to start before task1 can finish, so I suppose task2 should be calculated first. I don't think there are many use cases for it, I can't pull one from the top of my head just now ;) > > > > - KDGantt: > > > > There has been some improvements to KDGantt since these todos where > > written. Note that KDGantt is a little tricky since it's code originates > > from Klaraelvdalens Datakonsult (KD). They develop on their original and > > may (or may not) donate their changes to us. This means that the more > > changes we do on our "copy" the more problems we have when KD's changes > > shall be merged with ours. That said, kplato needs *some* additions to > > work, so we can't totally avoid it. OTOH if we make some useful, good > > quality patches KD might want to incorporate them. > > What are your current relationship with KDAB? It would be interesting to > have feedback from them before hand if we want to push patches. It would be > unfortunate to prepare patches that wouldn't get integrated upstream. Not much of an relationship atm, I don't know (think) there is anyone from KDAB that follows up on us. I have sort of postponed KDGantt atm since I have lot of other stuff to do :) KDGantt needs to be ported to qt4 which I suspect is not an easy job, there are some peculiar code in there. But, it's not urgent, it will run as long as qt3support exists. > > > > - Icons. Would be nice to have a set with a consistent look. > > > > Yes, please, artists are in short supply! > > > > Prio: 5 ( :) ) > > Just to make it clear, I doubt they have the skills and the time to work on > this one. Well, maybe one or two of them have the skills, but probably not > the time. I didn't really expect it, hence my smiley. > > That said, it would probably be interesting to work on expressing the needs > (which icons, and what they should display) for our KDE artists. Maybe > contacting the kde-artists list would be a nice first step. In the worst > case it would raise awareness that KPlato needs icons, in the best case on > of the artists would work on it guided by the expressed needs. Yes, agree to that. I think they know, though, because contact has been made both for kplato alone and for koffice as a whole. Hmmm, time flies, it must have been nearly a year ago, before 1.5 release. The dream is to have a constistent set for all of koffice, of course. > > It was just my 0.02€ :-) > > Have a nice day. -- Mvh Dag Andersen _______________________________________________ kplato mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kplato