Re: Comments on proposal for revised license policy
Alex Merry <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 13 Sep 2007, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2007 00:37, Alex Merry wrote: > > This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public > > License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > > version 2 of the License, or version 3 of the License, or, at the > > discretion of KDE e.v. (which shall act as a proxy as in section > > 14 of version 3 of the License), any later version. > > > > Or you can just put "either version 2 of the License, or (at your > > option) and later version". > > Shouldn't the first paragraph also include an "at your option"? So > this would basically mean that the libs are multiply licenses, right? Hmm... it might make it more obvious. And I think it should be Lesser. This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the GNU Library General Public License, or (at your option) version 2.1 or 3 of the GNU Lesser General Public License, or, at the discretion of KDE e.v. (which shall act as a proxy as in section 14 of version 3 of the License), any later version. It should be noted that the wording of the license itself make it an "at your option" situation, but it could look like KDE e.v. gets to choose which of 2, 2.1 or 3 you distribute it under. > > I think we should wait for TT to make a move before we think about > > that. If they go v3 only, there's not much point requiring v2 to be > > an option. > > Well, if we have an opinion on that it might influence what Trolltech > is doing quite a bit. Apparently TT's legal department are already reviewing GPLv3. My guess is they'll dual-license it under v2 or v3 at some point. Or they might just add GPL v3 to the exemptions, which should be enough for our purposes, I think. Alex -- KDE: http://www.kde.org Ubuntu/Kubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.org http://www.kubuntu.org _______________________________________________ Kde-licensing mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG6HiPBRauKLutZ9ARAvT8AKCTL6P7F5lJkGJ54J826mOYS93nCQCfRA91 lDueDrGZcIWT3vNh8U7N7N8= =E3F+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----