Re: Relicensing KioFuse from GPLv2+ to LGPLv2+
Kevin Ottens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le dimanche 30 septembre 2007, Vlad a écrit : > I'm working to port KioFuse to KDE4 with the hope that it will be > incorporated into kdelibs. According to the KDE licensing policy > (http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy), code residing in > kdelibs must be licensed as LGPL or a more permissive license. You > (Alexander Neundorf and Kévin 'ervin' Ottens) hold copyright on the > following files in KioFuse: > [...] > Thank you very much for your consideration, Well, I'm not against a relicensing from GPLv2+ to LGPLv2+ per say. That said, wanting to have KioFuse in kdelibs looks clearly misguided from a technical perspective... It's definitely not a library, and it really has nothing to do in kdelibs (apps don't have to use KioFuse, and shouldn't use it). In short, I'm wondering what you're trying to achieve here. Regards. -- Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net "Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître, Ne font reculer l'ignorance." _______________________________________________ Kde-licensing mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG/9XcB0u7y43syeIRAkqgAJ0QKffpZfxYoSBs32HMGk8R2COErwCfea45 rK0ROLv4tZfDyEExF8t0gWI= =igtf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----