Re: Updated Licence Draft

Jonathan Riddell <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:02:48 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.kde.licensing
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:22:01AM +0000, Alex Merry wrote:
> There are also several that said v2+ but not v2/v3/e.v.  I'm not sure 
> how we reconcile with those who say v2/v3/e.v. but not v2+ if they 
> worked on the same file...

Just note that the file contains code under both terms, it'll come
down to the lower common denominator which would be v2/v3/e.v.

Jonathan