Re: Updated Licence Draft

Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> Yes, but aren't there a number of contributors who still don't want to have 
> the blanket "or later" statement, although they agree to license under GPL 3? 
> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KDE_Relicensing seems to indicate that.

Say, how come I am on the TODO list? :-)

  GPLv2 ->  GPLv2+   - NO
LGPLv2 -> LGPLv2+   - NO
  GPLv2 ->  GPLv2+v3 - YES
LGPLv2 -> LGPLv2+v3 - YES
KDE e.V. decides    - NO*

Btw, is "KDE e.V. decides" referring to the v3 clause allowing e.V. to 
allow a later version of GPL, or to allow /an arbitrary license/? Might 
want to make that clear...

(* but I might change my mind. I'm also curious if there is such a thing 
as '/in the event I cannot be contacted/, e.V. can decide' :-).)

-- 
Matthew
"Still not King." -- Aragorn
(as quoted in The Very Secret Diaries by Cassandra Claire)
http://www.ealasaid.com/misc/vsd/