Re: Updated Licence Draft

On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Ingo Klöcker wrote:

> Frankly, I don't see why we should run again knowingly into exactly the
> same trap we are currently trying to escape from. I formally object
> against watering down the license policy by allowing "(L)GPL v2 or v3"
> just because a few people for whatever reasons trust neither the FSF
> nor the KDE e.V.

I think we can add 

(L)GPL v2, v3 and FLA

to the list with no problem (assuming that we finish the FLA). But indeed, the 
contributions that fail to meet any of those should fade out. 


Dirk