Re: QPL still needed?

Matthias Ettrich <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.licensing
Organization Trolltech
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 04:59, Kevin Forge wrote:
> The lack of clarity is in and of itself reason enogh to cover everyones
> asses with the QPL.
>
> The code in KDE itself is all compatible with the GPL.  However as you
> point out there are
> comersial QT apps out there.  

As I wrote in my previous email, that can be covered for with a little 
exception.

[snip]

> There might be apps onder the old BSD license or other none GPL
> compatible licenses.
>     I don't know of any specific ones (but they are probebly just
> unpopular).
>
> BTW: This license change would put TheKompany.com out of business.

??? What makes you think that? Please elaborate.

 Matthias
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.