Re: Oxygen font licensing

A Quarta, 25 de Janeiro de 2012 16:47:08 Dave Crossland você escreveu:
> Hi all!
> 
> Sorry about this, Vern sent me the thread and I see I misunderstood.
> 
> On 25 January 2012 08:16, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Richard is suggesting that when a font is partially copied into a PDF
> > document, it can reasonably be considered separate to the combined
> > work of the document.
> 
> Richard, I see you were not suggesting that :-)
> 
> > Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The problem is that the OFL might not extend to the GPL text,
> >> but the GPL text could well extend to the font. Which in my opinion
> >> also is how it should be: If there were an unfree font in a PDF, I
> >> might not be able to distribute changed versions of the text in
> >> the same format, because I would not be allowed to redistribute
> >> the font.
> 
> If true, it would also be true of images/graphics that are also
> embedded in PDFs with GPL texts. How are non-free images used with GPL
> texts handled?
> 
> I suggest that the simplest solution would be to make the Oxygen font
> available under GPLv2, GPLv3 and OFL.

Is it comply wrong if we licence it like everything else on oxygen as LGPL??? 
onestly i dont care one bit  about this issues as long as its free and open im 
OK.

-- 
oxygen guy, "I make the pretty pictures"

_______________________________________________
Kde-licensing mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing