Re: Oxygen font licensing

Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 07:40:19 schrieb Richard Stallman:
>     > We don't recommend the use of the GPL for texts for humans to
>     > read.
> 
>     You mean, like nicely written sourcecode? If you did not mean
>     that, you an be sure that you will be misunderstood.
> 
> You seem to be hostile, and trying harass me.  However, your point is
> valid to the extent that people make PDF files from source code.
> Thus, we can't avoid the issue of GPL-covered text in source code.

I don’t want to harrass you.I’m just in that discussion with CC folks right 
now,and I think I should take a break from it.

I’m sorry that I sounded harsh.

>     In the recent discussions about possble cc by-sa to GPL
>     compatibility, this was cited as reason for not adding that more
>     often than anything else.
> 
> Whoever had those discussions are welcome to talk with me about it.

I think you would need to join cc-licensing and cc-community for that…

Best wishes,
Arne

_______________________________________________
Kde-licensing mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAAEIAAYFAk8kNgoACgkQ3M8NswvBBUjwRwP7BWiNlQGWnpeblT/DPuOQwPCB
jNZQ/OXDaIMsOGqQrz2+A4VS53hbCV0kh4phk+7heTDbh1mkgfUDo+ezkmVQCVBi
XMFE4LGZAIfZgiXLzI2YKrF1ZWJcKnWqxlzRV5r41DSfj4bKdJKJCT+yK09kQuxA
zXJ1ezUcdzZrwp1TTZY=
=z8N4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----