Re: Oxygen font licensing

I need to double check on this.
The source could (should?) be dual licensed right now, but, the google webfont version of 'oxygen regular' will be released in a few weeks, so the dual licensing will for sure kick in then. To be honest i am no licensing expert and have simply neglected that dual-aspect on the git repository. I thought someone else with repo access might have done it by now ;)  I'm happy for others to do it whenever/however they think is correct. If anyone wants to get the LGPL licensing sorted for the repo, please do it.

-vern



On 8 Mar 2012, at 22:00, Jonathan Riddell wrote:

> 
> As I understand it the decision has been to dual licence under SIL and LGPL?  Is this change going to be reflected in the git archive?
> 
> Jonathan