Re: License policy and Apache
Mirko Boehm <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:39:41 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 13, 2012, at 10:48, Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> wrote: >> With that in mind, there is no reason not to accept Apache if we accept = >> BSD. What do you guys think? > > Currently we have been aiming for gplv2+ compatibility in all > application code, which the mit/x11/3-clause-bsd licenses all fulfill. > > I like that we stay gplv2+ compatbile. Just wondering what the point of that is for new application code? When reusing application code in frameworks, I assume we would relicense it under LGPL. AFAIK, Apache allows for that. Cheers, Mirko. -- Mirko Boehm | [email protected] | KDE e.V. FSFE Fellow, FSFE Team Germany Qt Certified Specialist