Re: Alternative Licenses not in the KDE Licensing Policy
Jonathan Riddell <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:09:47 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We don't include Apache 2 in our licencing policy because it's incompatible with GPL 2. And there's still code which is GPL 2 only plus it's good to minimise when code is under a licence which effectively can't be used. > 3) Would KDE consider hosting Apache License 2.0 code at all? It would need a change to the licence policy. You could dual licence as GPL 3 + Apache, both of which have termination clauses for patent abuse. Jonathan