Re: shut down list?

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:35:40 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.licensing
Message-ID <2952054.1oBcGnuQx3@thufir>
--nextPart5097819.dA4lDfyKs7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Monday 31 July 2017 17:43:48 Matija =C5=A0uklje wrote:
> Dne ponedeljek, 31. julij 2017 ob 16:55:52 CEST je Jonathan Riddell
> napisal(a):
> >  So I suggest to shut this list down and have the few
> > discussions we have on licencing on kde-community.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m in general in favour both of this move and operating in t=
he open
> more.
>=20
> What I wonder though is whether one list is public and the other one
> private.

Both lists are public.


> And if so, will some more tricky topics (e.g. breaches and
> violations) need to be then escalated to the board list to be
> (initially) addressed away from the public eye to avoid needless
> public repercussions?

Yes, those more tricky topics are better escalated to the board.


> My second concern is if kde-community is very active, would discussin=
g
> licensing questions there drown in the other discussions?

I'd say it's active, but not very active.

Some statistics for kde-community:
Q1 2017: 150 messages ([1])
Q2 2017: 64 messages ([2])
July 2017: 139 messages ([3])


Regards,
Ingo

[1] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2017q1/date.html
[2] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2017q2/date.html
[3] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2017q3/date.html

--nextPart5097819.dA4lDfyKs7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAll/orMACgkQGnR+RTDgudgqqACfRdpG6+tTrT++jTA8NlKCQFme
pSgAnR8LuiMxijW2Kx9aYCiud4scZn+B
=wx5F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5097819.dA4lDfyKs7--