Re: shut down list?
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:35:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2952054.1oBcGnuQx3@thufir> |
--nextPart5097819.dA4lDfyKs7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Monday 31 July 2017 17:43:48 Matija =C5=A0uklje wrote: > Dne ponedeljek, 31. julij 2017 ob 16:55:52 CEST je Jonathan Riddell > napisal(a): > > So I suggest to shut this list down and have the few > > discussions we have on licencing on kde-community. >=20 > I=E2=80=99m in general in favour both of this move and operating in t= he open > more. >=20 > What I wonder though is whether one list is public and the other one > private. Both lists are public. > And if so, will some more tricky topics (e.g. breaches and > violations) need to be then escalated to the board list to be > (initially) addressed away from the public eye to avoid needless > public repercussions? Yes, those more tricky topics are better escalated to the board. > My second concern is if kde-community is very active, would discussin= g > licensing questions there drown in the other discussions? I'd say it's active, but not very active. Some statistics for kde-community: Q1 2017: 150 messages ([1]) Q2 2017: 64 messages ([2]) July 2017: 139 messages ([3]) Regards, Ingo [1] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2017q1/date.html [2] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2017q2/date.html [3] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2017q3/date.html --nextPart5097819.dA4lDfyKs7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAll/orMACgkQGnR+RTDgudgqqACfRdpG6+tTrT++jTA8NlKCQFme pSgAnR8LuiMxijW2Kx9aYCiud4scZn+B =wx5F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5097819.dA4lDfyKs7--