Re: [off-topic] Re: desktop icons with relative path to .desktop file
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Jun 2023 16:43:35 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi all, On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:39:02 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2023-06-08 at 15:45 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > you can fork FOSS whose devs you dislike =20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > only when 2 things come together >=20 > 1. you must have the skills >=20 > 2. you must have the time >=20 you need2have them when forking proprietary SW too (in addition to restrict= ive licences and inavailability of sources). > A third point, hardware, completely disregarded. I don't mean the driver > problem, but the variety of hardware combinations that can lead to > things such as jitter, which becomes an unsolvable problem in real-time > applications in terms of software. >=20 > Proprietary systems cannot be replaced by a good attitude and FLOSS > only. >=20 > Don't get me wrong, good attempts exist, such as > https://www.cip-project.org/ . >=20 > However, it's of no use to the freelance artist, for example, if Linux > isn't even remotely up-to-date in many domains. If I want to, for > example, I can play violins with my guitar, that's not possible with a > MIDIfied guitar and a sample player only, you need software that models > a violin. >=20 > You don't get everything you need to make a living when using FLOSS > only. >=20 As a blogger/writer, and software dev geek, I have made 10s of millions of = USDs , while using FOSS fedora desktop. > Non-linear video editing even without all the patented features? Desktop > publishing? It's not just about what's possible with Linux, it's about > how quickly you can achieve a result. >=20 > We cannot just build a car, even if we have got the skills, we still > need the time, the room and tools to do this. If we are able to build > our own car, we still need to get the permission to use it. >=20 > It's not much different for software. >=20 > Not even an all-rounder has unlimited time and needs to prioritize. Does > s/he want to write software or does s/he want to produce something that > already requires mature software? >=20 > My everyday user-centric Linux distribution is Arch Linux. I'm currently > experimenting with Alpine Linux. Something like this is time consuming > even with a lot of experience. You can't just install a user-friendly > distro to get things done, there are proprietary solutions for certain > tasks. >=20 > But I must stop writing now, as I have yet to bake my buns and weave the > fabric for my laundry right after I have sheared the sheep that graze on > my lands. > heh, reminds me of https://www.reddit.com/r/EDM/comments/26e2vw/i_thought_using_loops_was_chea= ting/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus and https://twitter.com/shlomif/status/1542047869989011457 . --=20 Shlomi Fish https://www.shlomifish.org/ UNIX Fortune Cookies - https://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/ Knuth is not God! Unless you confuse him with Dijkstra. =E2=80=94 https://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/facts/Knuth/ Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - https://shlom.in/reply .