Re: Clipboard
Matt Perry <[email protected]> Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:23:33 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.look |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In the sole intrest of usability, I would personally have a problem with the changed cut/copy/paste icons -- instead of changing the standard icons, (if the application supports it) you should turn on the "Icon + Text" toolbar setting. Changing the cut/copy/paste icon is like changing the shape and size of a Stop sign... you just can't do it. However, you can write "STOP" on it to make it more effective to those who are unaware of what a big red octagon on the side of the road means. I also think the idea of a Klipper menu by holding "paste" is excellent and would in fact enhance the usability of applications requiring lots of copy/paste operations (Kate, etc.). - Matt On Sunday 04 August 2002 10:58 am, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi everybody! > > Once again I couldn't concentrate on the important things and was lead > away by the annoying mouse support of the clipboard within KDE. Here is > the result: > > As you can see on all the screenshots on kde-look.org and elsewhere > noone seems to change the order of the clipbpard buttons on the toolbar. > Even the symbols might have never changed since their introduction anno > domini (was it ms word 4.0?). But is this due to usage tradition, or is > the concept really the best? I doubt the later. When in mouse mode and > about to work with the clipboard I always find myself to stop for a > moment to remind what symbol is what (yes, I DO work almost daily with a > computer ;) > > So I worked out an alternative solution. The reasoning is as followed: > > 1. Both actions "copy" and "cut" have in common the adding of something > to the clipboard. Thus they both have an element that shows the adding: > the moving paper. The difference is quite obvious shown: copy leaves the > original, cut leaves an empty place. Seems more obvious to me than a > scissor and the doubled paper (haven't tested for small sizes like > 16x16, though). > > 2. Look at the old copy symbol. The new paper moves to the left. But the > clipboard symbol is usually at the right. Now I think it makes more > sense if the cutted/copied paper moves in the direction of the clipboard > symbol. > > 3. I placed one action to the right, the other to the left of the > clipboard symbol. Maybe this placement makes it easier to associate the > action also with the place. This way you can already start to move your > mouse cursor into the direction of the clipboard symbol while > remembering what is where. Arrived at the position of the clibboard > symbol a simple move to the left or to the right will reach your aim. > > 4. The kicker applet "klipper" is nice, but ouf of my work flow. Why not > offer the whole usable klipper content via an additional dropdown menu > on long button click, like with the navigation buttons of konqueror? > > 5. I am not sure about this: Wouldn't it make more sense if the > clipboard is not greyed out if no content is available but shows the > status by an empty clipboard? The clipboard could be greyed out if > inserting is not possible, like in readonly mode. > > I really like my idea. It breaks tradition, but look at the attachment: > Isn't the new solution a step forward in usability? > > So, what do you think about this? > > Friedrich > > PS: And would be more eyecandy than usability: When copying and > inserting via the clipboard the movement of the data is visualized by a > flow to and off the clipboard from and to the actual placement in the > document view... like the window movements to and from the taskbar when > hiding/unhiding :)