Re: Having Konqueror/kDesktop displaying media volume label
David Golden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.look |
|---|---|
| Organization | Legion |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
First let me say that I really don't think that this is a KDE issue, and is more properly handled with a modification to the way removeable media are treated by the underlying OS. Hell, at least we're not using single-letter drive names... > The ONLY REALLY BIG ISSUE I see exists in any environment, and that is > simply this: > What do you do with two disks having the same volume label? > How did the Amiga solve this? Anybody know? As far as I recall, Amiga just used a simple "first disk wins", with the first disk the system sees getting the name, and the others only accessible anonymously through the device names (e.g. df0: cd0:, dh0: ). There were occasional problems, where people booted with a disk in-drive called a particular name that conflicted with some core system name could screw up the system (not booted from the disk, just with the disk in a drive!) - here's a bug report from 1996: http://www.ewertb.com/AMUC/9601/LightROM3.html When you removed the first disk, the next disk did not "get" the name - In fact, for reasons of data integrity, it was probably best that it didn't. It also used straight string-based matching - if you tried to write to ram:, and you happened to have made ram: point somewhere silly, it'd go right ahead anyway. That's more of a feature than a problem - I'd much prefer a computer to do what I tell it, even if it's to do something stupid, and that's the Unix (and Amiga) Way. -------------------------------------------------------