Re: Moving away from app-centric mimetypes (e.g. kword)
Eric E <[email protected]> Thu, 16 May 2002 16:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.look |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Howdy, > This is why, ultimately, no metadata system without > kernel support can > ever be complete. This is true, but if you consider how much work it would take to get a kernel-level change like a filesystem to be widespread enough that KDE could depend on it, the metadata feature will be dead before it ever arrives. > This is not to suggest that partial solutions aren't > helpful. This is the approach I'd vote for. Let's get it done now, rather than take a long time to get it done right. Modern machines are overpowered, and it sure seems like they'll continue to be. If there were a local search engine that integrate each app's metadata to make some good indices, you could get very powerful search results and virtual directories into Konqi very quickly. And given the robustness of the Kparts architecture, KDE is well poised for this. Plus getting some kind of metadata searching incoporated into a desktop and usable can help serve as a roadmap for lower-level approaches. To give an example: Friedrich mentioned marking a Kword doc a letter. I think that's an excellent refinement on Clippy. If you're writing a letter, have KWord pop up a little window (inobtrusively, like the way the light bulb pops up in OpenOffice) that with a drop-down box to classifies the document as a letter. Then enable the find feature in Konqueror to recognize the document-type metadata, and filter on it. At the very least, this would mean a column in the search results called "Document Type" It would not be the most elegant or complete solution, but it would be working, and it would get people using it and thinking about it more. My $.02222222 Cheers, Eric __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com