Re: Moving away from app-centric mimetypes (e.g. kword)
"Friedrich W. H. Kossebau" <[email protected]> Sun, 19 May 2002 20:13:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.look |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sven Niedner schrieb: > Another useful thing would be storing the history of a file: you write > a letter to X using a template. Another day, you load it, modify it, > and save it under a different name. This letter should remember its > parent(s), and the initial template. Meta data should be inherited, > too. I know this is a common behaviour. But... what if there were an option to "open as copy"? Would people use it, when they were about to use an existing document as template for a new? IMHO it is totally wrong/unsecure to edit an existing document which is intended to be the start of another one. I have often seen people who accidentally clicked on "save" instead of "save as..." loosing the old document's content. I agree on the other hand that a "save as..." might have it's advantages if one decides in the middle of the editing the actual document should become a new one in parralel to the original one. Friedrich