Re: Moving away from app-centric mimetypes (e.g. kword)
Mariusz Pekala <[email protected]> Mon, 20 May 2002 11:48:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.look |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <02052011484600.01568@panoramix> |
On Wed 15 May 2002 00:24, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > The disadvantages are that, if you move or rename a file, you lose the > > metadata. But since this is a Proof Of Concept, and not a perfect > > implementation, perhaps we can live with that limitation in the short > > term. > > Most of my renaming and moving of files is done these days in konqueror > so if it has support there should be no loss. And for command line there > could be an alias for "mv" etc that invokes a script doing things that > are nessecary to keep metadata consistent. > > So everything that is missing is someone coding it :( Personally, I don't like the concept of an alias. You suggest I HAVE to have it to keep the system working properly? For people using unix-like filesystems the identifier of a file is not it's name but it's i-node number. Bind metadata not to a name, but to i-node and you're safe to rename file. This does not solve the 'copy' problem, anyway. --MP