Re: Bittorrent. Where's the torrent?
Andrew Hunter <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:59:43 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.non-linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John Velman wrote: > I want to get KDE 4 native for OX X (leaopard, imac). Have never used > bitttorrent before, but since this seems to be the only way to get kde 4 > for mac, I decided to try. > > I installed Tomato as the bittorrent client. Use transmission, Tomato is rotten. > > So far, I've been downloading for a total of about 16 hours spread over two > days (I don't leave the mac on at night, but Tomato seemed to start where > it left off yesterday.) > > So far, I've gotten 34.5 % of the 2.45 GB. At the moment it says 22 hours > 33 minuts to go. > > The download rate hovers around zero a lot, is currently 9.8K/s, Once I saw > it go up to 40 K/s. At the moment there are 2 peers, 17 seeds. I've seen > as many as 20 seeds. The maximum upload rate, which is adjustable, is set > at 20K/s. Have you opened ports on your router? See http://portforward.com > > I have a broadband cable connection (cox). In the past I've downloaded multiple > CD's for linux distributions, never experiencing anything remotely like > this slowness (not since I downloaded stuff over a 56K telephone modem > years ago.). If the ports are open (and the client configured correctly), you ISP could be throttleing bittorrent. > > Is there something I can adjust to make things go faster? I can't find any > info on setting up for bittorrent. Seems to me the number of seeds and > peers is beyond my control. Don't know what a "new tracker" is, or if it > wouold help. > See above. Search wikipedia for more information about bittorrent. > Baring my having done something really dumb out of ignorance (an an > inability to find TFM), this seems like a really bad way to distribute > software. > > In olden times when we wanted to distribute something big over telephone, > we usually split the binary up into manageable pieces that could be ftp'd > separately and reassembled once downloaded. This was also necessary when > saving to 1.4Mb floppy's. I fondly remember DJGPP being quite usable and > transportable from home to work by this means. Though slow, at least it > was predictable, with definite milestones achieved when each chunk was > completed. And possible to predict when you would be finished. Of course > in those days big might have been 40MB. > > Still, bittorrent seems a miserable way to get the mac version of KDE out. > That is still 2.45Gb of server rape over ftp per person. Seeing as Ben (RangerRick) does not have a beefy enough server for all the files (The Everything torrent has been downloaded over 15 000 times IIRC) Bittorrent allows us to share some of that load. > End of rant. > > I appreciate any advice. Otherwise, at least I've gotten my frustration > out, a little. I hope to have KDE by next Tuesday at the current rate. I > hope Idon't have to re-download the whole thing anytime soon. (Now the > percentage downloaded is already 35%, after writing this. Current download > rate: 0.6K/s, 2 pears, 15 seeds.) > > Best, > > John Velman > > > _______________________________________________ > kde-nonlinux mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-nonlinux >