Re: KDE CVS Commit Policy
Dirk Mueller <[email protected]> Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:46:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] schrieb am Sonntag, den 08. Juni 2003: > I want to protest about the point 19 (no CVS keywords) and especially to have > changed the KDE CVS so that CVS keywords does not work anymore. We didn't change CVS so that CVS keywords don't work anymore. In fact, I'm trying: koffice/filters/kword/rtf/export $ grep Revision ExportFilter.cc QString revision("$Revision: 2.54 $"); koffice/filters/kword/rtf/export $ cvsversion ExportFilter.cc 2.54 Looks like its working for me. In fact, wether or not CVS keywords are expanded pretty much depends on your -k setting you used during checkout the module (there is a way to make the magic word expansion mode sticky but thats not done for your filters as far as I can see). BTW, the point was about $Id$ (cvsversion does the same) and $Log$ (just bloating the files and making merging very complicated). > I also want to point out that point 20 should be extended to multiple > directories too, not only to multiple files. That was intended, clarified the explanation. > Also point 18: flex and bison should *not* be assumed. Automake/autoconf can > only deal with yacc/lex-compatibility. Well, it _says_ that one should not assume flex/bison: <quote> Tools which shouldn't be a requirement for building KDE include lex/flex, yacc/bison, python, ruby etc. </quote> -- Dirk