Re: [kde-announce] KDE Security Advisory: Konqueror Referer Authentication Leak
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:41:16 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 July 2003 08:14, Rob Kaper wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:56:16PM +0200, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > > Why does it take 18 days to release a security update? > > > > It takes the time it needs to ship the fix. > > I would say that three business days should be enough for any > self-respecting, commercial, professional distribution. I'm talking about > the security fix here, no a complete KDE upgrade. i'm unsure how to reply, as i'm not sure whether you are speaking from an informed position re: security or whether you are simply speaking from a theoretical standpoint. i say this because your argument sounds like that of someone who has a theoretical unerstanding, rather than a practical one, of the topic. have you ever been directly involved with mandating and performing the security processes of a substantial software project, or involved in providing security services to such a project? if so, would you mind offering an example? please note that the above isn't meant as insult, anymore than you asking me if i had ever skydived would be an insult if we were talking about safety precautions involved in skydiving. =) - -- Aaron J. Seigo GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/KIHN1rcusafx20MRApj8AJ0RFm1a71N97NXqHhIlK8bylLAJPQCfdFS/ dVyWVbioDTteIa/oXLxXdcE= =FhcP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----