Re: Fwd: Hayes
Neil Stevens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday January 27, 2003 04:00, Charles Samuels wrote: > Neil wrote: > > So, then comes Hayes 1.2, which included some very nice optimizations > > by Carsten Pfeiffer. Carsten has asked me to return Hayes to CVS, > > giving me > > You saying that Hayes 1.2 has very nice optimizations doesn't change any > fact. It changes nothing. I asked on kde-multimedia in order to accomodate one of my contributors, Carsten. As I said in the mail to kde-multimedia ( http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-multimedia&m=104302836723826 ), I'm fine either way on this matter. > > his opinion that Charles doesn't have control over kdeaddons. Not > > knowing what people think, I asked kde-multimedia for opinions. > > And I did not respond because I knew that, for one thing, kde-multimedia > has a low readership, especially amongst the policy-makers. We would > end up arguing about this like we have time and again on IRC. Well, no, IRC is not a decision making forum. Only the mailing lists are accessable to all developers regardless of time zone. > > So now here we are in kde-policies, with a simple question: Does the > > maintainer of a plugin-based application have veto power over what > > plugins get included in the release? And does that veto power carry > > over to the kdeaddons package of extra plugins, too? > > And also, how does a kdeaddons module differ from its application's > actual module? Yes, good question. - -- Neil Stevens - [email protected] "Distinctions by race are so evil, so arbitrary and insidious that a state bound to defend the equal protection of the laws must not allow them in any public sphere." -- Thurgood Marshall -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Ncoof7mnligQOmERAs3aAKCUgYE+vr6OijBDAsGtvFIOy/NdNgCfQyOd VFvc+Ar3UUp/Nlwi8Fq2LQU= =66Lg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----