Re: Icon Removal (was: Re: Icons in kdelib)
Kenneth Wimer <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Oct 2003 18:54:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Martijn Klingens <[email protected]> [Oct 05. 2003 13:32]: > On Sunday 05 October 2003 12:15, Marc Mutz wrote: > > Icon removal should be considered equivalent to removing kdelibs methods > > or classes: You can't do that in a stable series and if you do it for > > KDE 4, you have to document how to do the porting. > > Yes, I agree here. Even though it's a bad idea to use kdelibs icons 'as is' > inside apps (they might be redrawn and look entirely different, no longer > serving the purpose for your app's action) it still happens all over the > place and indeed the kdelibs icons should IMO be considered a crude form of > 'public API'. I agree as well. The biggest problem facing me is that I have just started taking care of the icons and, although I know tackat very well personally, I evidently have no clue how he named the icons. It appears that of the 162 icons that I removed, the ones that directly effect kmail, are the inbox, outbox, and sent-mail folder icons. I actually see a good reason to include these in kdelibs - there might be other programs that use such icons. So or so, the missing icons are being drawn as we speak, sort of :-) bye, ken -- Kenneth Wesley Wimer II Graphical Consultant SUSE LINUX AG - GERMANY