Re: Fwd: Hayes

Marc Mutz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.policies
Organization KDE
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 00:16, Neil Stevens wrote:
<snip>
> So now here we are in kde-policies, with a simple question:  Does the
> maintainer of a plugin-based application have veto power over what
> plugins get included in the release?  And does that veto power carry
> over to the kdeaddons package of extra plugins, too?
<snip>

I'd say yes and yes. Plugins can deeply change the internals of 
applications and lead to unstable apps.

As far as plugins distributed with KDE releases are concerned, plugins 
are oftern not very visible, so a badly written plugin will reflect 
back badly on the app (maintainer).

Things are of course different if the plugin is not distributed with 
KDE. In that case, the user normally needs to install the plugin off 
appsy or whatever and thus is well aware of the plugin as an entity of 
it's own, separate from the app.

Marc

-- 
'When you see the ping of death, duck and cover.'
                        -- Bruce Schneier, Crypto-Gram Oct 2002
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+NcZV3oWD+L2/6DgRAmPjAJ93e5EFbt1BtEYBjtqWK/lBPI9QsQCg/MYh
5nqCMzQ0yRxSjv83KmEoiGw=
=UegP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.