Re: Id tags are fun
Olaf Jan Schmidt <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:17:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies,gmane.comp.kde.devel.core |
|---|---|
| Organization | KDE Accessibility Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [Stephan Kulow, Mo 23.02. 2004 19:03:19] > This is a commit policy, ergo about new code. So if new code is checked > in with $Id$ tags, you can still say stop and take them out. But the > $Id$ tags that are in now were added before we had such a policy. OK, I can agree with you here. What exactly is the technical reason you oppose Frans' patch? If we disallow new code with $id, why should we not remove existing appearances? The $id causes a number of small problems, after all. Do you insist that all maintainers must agree with the patch before it can be applied, or should we simply wait a couple of days and if noone disagrees, ask Frans to apply? Olaf - -- Olaf Jan Schmidt, KDE Accessibility Project KDEAP co-maintainer, maintainer of http://accessibility.kde.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAkA6Q9MACgkQoLYC8AehV8fmAACg3rFXSYIMbaQ3SmaeHy2Vz5s1 EKwAoLko1YxPMH3XvSAz22WsqcToWuDh =VcS+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----