Re: Proposal for P2P disclaimer text
Andreas Pour <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:46:02 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Sunday 14 March 2004 20:59, Waldo Bastian wrote: > > Just don't expect any sympathy or support if you end up in court due > > to your own negligence. > > Your comment is completely beside the point. > > Well, if NoSE wants to pay lawyers to scan hundreds and thousands of > patents for whether or not KMail infringes on any one of them, so be > it. I doubt it. I for one lack the financial support needed for this, > and even if I didn't, I'd think of it as a waste of resources. Earlier you had written: | It's much better to just ignore legal issues (esp. when you can't be | seriously expected to perfrom exhausting research, e.g. w.r.t. patents) | until they come up, and deal with them, then. In case you have not been paying attention to current events, the RIAA is suing a number of people for P2P file sharing. They have sued hundreds of defendants. This isn't just some patent hypothetical - or do you mean, we should wait until the KDE project is shut down, before reacting to legal threats to the project? > As I said, disclaimers such as those presented here can do more harm > than help. Said and proven / convinced is another issue. If someone will not use KDE P2P software b/c they want to unlawfully copy music and the license restriction interferes with their "freedom" to do so, so be it. > It's quite hard to convince a judge of their validity if > they disclaim stuff you knew beforehand. They raise the impression that > you only tried to cover your ass with them, not stand to them. I don't see how whether you agree with the law or not has any bearing. The issue one needs to worry about is "contributory infringement", which has a certain legal meaning, and whether or not in your heart of hearts you think that copyright law is good or bad for society is another issue. > And that is exactly the case here. It's like distancing yourself from > warez sites and at the same time maintaining a warez link list. I don't see the similarity. If KDE encourages unlawful use then such encouragement should immediately stop. Perhaps you are projecting your use of the software onto others? Ciao, Dre