Re: Proposal for P2P disclaimer text
Waldo Bastian <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:02:46 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu March 18 2004 17:31, Martin K=F6bele wrote: > On Thursday 18 March 2004 16:44, Martin K=F6bele wrote: > > GPL =A70: "[...]The act of running the Program is not restricted,[...]= ". > > > > > > So we can't restrict, we could warn though. > > even better are =A711 and =A712 in the "NO WARRANTY"-section. > (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html) > > After reading this, I think we don't need a p2p-disclaimer at all. > It is up to the user and the developers are not liable. That's of course assuming that these clauses are enforcable. However, as pe= r=20 =A75 a user could argue that he has not accepted the terms of the GPL and t= hat=20 therefor its terms are not applicable. There is also a danger that the broa= d=20 disclaimer terms in =A711 and =A712 are considered in breach of local consu= mer=20 protection laws and voided as a result. Cheers, Waldo =2D --=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>= >> ^ [email protected] | SUSE, The Linux Desktop Experts | [email protected] ^<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<= << =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAWg52N4pvrENfboIRAnsrAJ0cyDpg9mHjnwommk6CtsDWrIJM5ACfV/S4 anqGlF5O56IqhTaTXws7pak=3D =3Dl0yz =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----