Re: Proposal for P2P disclaimer text

Waldo Bastian <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:02:46 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.policies
Message-ID <[email protected]>
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu March 18 2004 17:31, Martin K=F6bele wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2004 16:44, Martin K=F6bele wrote:
> > GPL =A70:  "[...]The act of running the Program is not restricted,[...]=
".
> >
> >
> > So we can't restrict, we could warn though.
>
> even better are =A711 and =A712 in the "NO WARRANTY"-section.
> (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html)
>
> After reading this, I think we don't need a p2p-disclaimer at all.
> It is up to the user and the developers are not liable.

That's of course assuming that these clauses are enforcable. However, as pe=
r=20
=A75 a user could argue that he has not accepted the terms of the GPL and t=
hat=20
therefor its terms are not applicable. There is also a danger that the broa=
d=20
disclaimer terms in =A711 and =A712 are considered in breach of local consu=
mer=20
protection laws and voided as a result.

Cheers,
Waldo
=2D --=20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=
>>
^  [email protected]  |  SUSE, The Linux Desktop Experts  |  [email protected]
^<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<=
<<
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAWg52N4pvrENfboIRAnsrAJ0cyDpg9mHjnwommk6CtsDWrIJM5ACfV/S4
anqGlF5O56IqhTaTXws7pak=3D
=3Dl0yz
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----