Re: P2P Networks: Ninth Circuit Rejects Contributory Infringement Claims

--===============2041045907==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1474121.fXoNRLa909";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1474121.fXoNRLa909
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday, 8. November 2004 18:40, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2004 16:30, Andreas Pour wrote:
> > Since the legality of P2P software has come up from time to time on
> > this list, I would like to report some good news which, just by
> > happenstance ;-), confirms my legal analysis of the situation:
>
> If I understand the ruling correctly it implies that all distributed p2p
> networks would be considered legal. As long as there's no central
> indexing authority, the network is not infringing, right?

this is how I understand it as well.

Martin

--nextPart1474121.fXoNRLa909
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBj/aU9MGKMtbTf80RAjxhAJ4k4iCG58447iXDxSRYX/ovaEjVEgCg1z3j
gHMEaKSni1D8YYLdKILiWi4=
=sRCj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1474121.fXoNRLa909--

--===============2041045907==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Kde-policies mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-policies

--===============2041045907==--