Re: FLA
Marc Mutz <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Feb 2003 15:39:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Organization | KDE |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 06 February 2003 14:23, Waldo Bastian wrote:
<snip>
> I don't think KDE e.v. is currently equiped to handle such situation
> either. If you look at how long it takes to get anywhere with the
> trademark registration...
>
> If you are concerned about enforcement of your license then I think
> that assigning your copyright to the FSF is a more viable
> alternative. At least at this point in time.
<snip>
But at the point in time when KDE e.V. is ready to handle this, we'd get
the same problem again: Everyone has to re-contract with the KDE e.V.
I'd instead propose to contract with the KDE e.V. and let the e.V.
choose who _actually_ handles this. This could be the FSFE, this is
allowed by the FLA (at least that's my reading of paragraph 4).
Marc
--
It's good fortune for the government that the masses don't think.
-- Adolf Hitler
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+QnOK3oWD+L2/6DgRAokyAKCMq4t44lvsBnu7FBTD9pz1EfPbAwCg9mHW MnCGuta+mEmOYiDEZ0mrmv0= =BpX7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----