Re: [kde-discuss] KBE 1.0 - Build enviroment for KDE

"Shawn Walker" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.solaris
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Dec 7, 2007 12:42 AM, Alan DuBoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> > /opt is where it belongs on UNIX systems; /usr is forbidden.
>
> That is how it worked previously, but there has been a push to move things
> into /usr, where it rightfully belongs (some anyway).
>
> David Comay is working to get things moved from /usr/sfw to /usr, and it
> is my understanding that Indiana will have packages in /usr as well.
>
> Ultimately, KDE should be installed to /usr, which is how things work in
> the Linux world. Not that it is right, but the software should be located
> there, IMO, as it would on any system.
>
> Look at GNOME, Sun sticks it in /usr/.

No, that argument for moving to /usr does not hold here. I'm fairly
certain from the ARC cases (which I have been following with interest)
that their reasoning does not apply here as they are things that Sun
is distributing and is a completely different reasoning.

The filesystem standard for /opt applies to 3rd party (optional)
software that you add that does not come from the vendor.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde-solaris mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-solaris.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.