Re: [kde-discuss] Gentle Question
"John Sonnenschein" <[email protected]> Mon, 12 May 2008 14:08:08 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.solaris |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Shawn Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Mats Rojestal > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can't figure out what the advantage of using sun compilers is, > > maybe a death wish. My simple observations from gcc 4.x.x performance is > > that it's not inferior to other compilers. > > Solaris is not a major player in the OS market and making it harder to > > port software to Solaris isn't really a good idea. > > It's simple. The GNU C++ complier produces binaries that are not ABI > compatible with Sun Studio compilers. or other versions of the gnu compiler. > In addition, it produces code that is up to 50% slower on SPARC, and > often slower on x86. arguable in some cases, but generally true IME. The biggest reason that I can see though is that ARC says "sun studio for all C++ integrations" (precisely because g++ can't keep it's own abi stable across releases ), meaning that if it's going in to Solaris, it has to be done via studio CC -- PGP Public Key 0x437AF1A1 Available on hkp://pgp.mit.edu ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde-solaris mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-solaris. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.