Re: KCM for network configuration
Björn Balazs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.usability,gmane.comp.kde.devel.plasma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3103391.VjqVyZLdRo@rechenknecht> |
Am Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2016, 16:03:51 CEST schrieb Heiko Tietze: > On 10/13/2016 10:57 AM, Jan Grulich wrote: > > So what do you think? > > > > [1] - https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/kcm_network.png > > Awesome, really nice! > > A few nitpicks: > * a little bit more vertical space between the controls > * the checkbox needs a label like "[ ] Enable" or better "Visibility: [ ] > Hidden Network" * Random has ellipsis indicating that there is more > interaction; not sure if that's true for generation of a random number > > And remarks: > * years ago we had the goal to get rid of tabs > * I wonder how you deal with the not so happy paths; left list is unexpected > concise > > But good work anyway. Most users will likely be very happy with your > solution. I totally agree with Heiko. This is a good step. The real work waits when it comes to consolidate the actual content of the Tabs (additional to what Heiko said e.g. do we need an extra Tab for Security?)... Cheers, Björn
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCAAGBQJYBguYAAoJEGsTrST+yb/geBMP/jh5G4AVVtaGk4RTXFLLwSBO VqWNb3pbePqC7FVytLR+CChLRvgaq4y1DMLuSMTUJSewF+JV0k/n5VYQAUiASPNc Ys79RwWS2C+OxxXTscv69Q19Cy1giN1USCnJkkRkv4TzH8pHRMICBx9K+qbD2xX+ i9txSvb9o2Kg0CqZbHhJz3YvG/JvFFtsg7ErsDEaObjFb18QqNyLCY965rTgxl8D FgiunJUcr7HlmpoOx4tT57i0ugRE7cxBi1Ug04o5ucuJNi7dw/nYTaQ0iWh+MdRQ SXn1LvjNbb6Rww9SNa2DwVGeeWoSWGdTUPqEcVnvmMEdfQHub2frfHHAza0Y8P5E oBJc2mKreqrXLIzv3hHHNcrTv2CxlYo5jbZaHuTULFn95gzPFoLfjGdYjx9u60oO 52VE4H+yyfXmaBKhO4cv1wmxfFq40ssNgUB9KLYYJPtDUqw9N5+bzWsvEdFK058H cEvtoJ25UYM6esLXBA9Z86rjPezbW2uZiQ1mLO6qBHhTOQcMsaPcu96Rx7tNXb9P +f0WAoR5qf4K/4uLrZpvla9enE5br9v5hVza8yNtXr9qZNIXVT6y7ouK1lOzjT6j Gfmc0dTvatDfziPck/V+yGL3OVySYqGQOX5zxMJEA9jjbamhtcBJOPqe5hhDMpv3 HBAPjdgoDXBTz/0XZdqr =lAjy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----