Re: KDE vs. native/Qt file dialogs
Sven Brauch <mail-ITmcY+a7/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.kdevelop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/01/17 23:32, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > What do others think? Customised open/save dialogs are not uncommon > on neither Mac nor MS Windows, and the KDE dialog works fine with the > native macintosh style (I can't check on MS Win.). Would there be > demand and support for making the KDE file dialog available as a > build-time option, or maybe even as a runtime preference (like > OpenOffice/LibreOffice does)? In the latter case one could link the > initial/default setting to KDE_FULL_SESSION. The dialog is ok on Linux but on Windows, it's quite terrible. It has none of the favourites you expect it to have, and instead has lots of custom ones; plus it looks and behaves completely different from the rest of the OS. Let's not use it on Windows. On Linux I agree that it's far better than the other available options (esp. the default Qt dialog, but also the GTK3 one is quite annoying). Greetings, Sven
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEESmKXmTK7vOXjlWrPaMqOOMS7P0sFAlhtmKMACgkQaMqOOMS7 P0tN8Q//SE4QNY+mrF3m9kEGIpZU1OO5meFy9PBqYCoZwh67MEISI+SivXIPuFsR klKUN/r5/0veXh72jr4xKr04V/FYxTWRQUjAXaLBe859vcFdJc2LTxpzz8gan1Mn I3TayuPNvTe4CN1GJu0HqRMc2OPj/dJf3ZjXEB7mRgw74AYw4UnO77RO8VEnpjXY 1TW0hV72SutbPzjyODd8M7VSI1t17Js4S21Ww0UJ3f1snFgXzHDhGiSKcSZ2J9YB zI6w8oQCtaJDB3SCT+o5PvxMDVqZyZOLM2wMc0J6REMWj2qhvRxiSM+hP5aE5hOO RLBZNxeFZEDP8RDZZbhSM8dAn7z0nlNPA6y4C/j6rYWmT6NfzR5Fwnth9Rh+zeJQ oBZt8BYCB4IYtnhgYN05uguLeDK+uS71PAEz+OSNZPk+mRvRl8/ozvJSYwqNbFzX YA3B/1Ale5pS/z43nOS2Vy3bAKgzEgYhwzXKWhVomqNXVpGQh86RafTzk3YG+hX8 NbvOHazvvW1KWa6OZGwGGF4Ef/+nxd4+3IpX0z9M/eBwcWJrO0nAJzT8mr26PHeG XIIOhFdMenb7aYbXU2MIBnjaOKkcrG8fa8MjNSIYeBjn0khuRCNt/EW2fKLm7wef xs88TIZSmyZjURLdgTCuq32tf05hbtRtFL51iZHI9nnOxZRQYac= =jXu0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----