Re: meson or generic ninja support?
Axel Kellermann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.kdevelop,gmane.comp.kde.devel.kdevelop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05.12.2017 13:38, Kevin Funk wrote: > On Wednesday, 11 October 2017 21:51:07 CET Axel Kellermann wrote: >> Thanks, I'll have a look. Can I contact you directly via email if I have >> questions, or do you prefer the mailing list or IRC? > > Heya, > > just got reminded about Meson since someone is now looking at implementing > support for Bazel... > > IRC is preferred for discussing implementation details and the like. > > Did you have any chance at looking at the meson branch and driving it further, > Axel? I fixed some little issues that prevented compilation on my machine and tried to wrap my head around the prototype, but then life and work got in the way big time. So no real progress, sorry. If the prototype in the meson branch is useful for Bazel implementation, go ahead and base your work upon it. If I find time to work on meson again, I'll work around this. Regards, Axel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSLzYNrZUlHz7B7lzkMRwnlI9Ye7gUCWipV2AAKCRAMRwnlI9Ye 7lhBAKCVwbqgI4ZALFVxruF2N6aV9Mt2BgCdFIAozkTFroftkXx73vQ4XinQBuc= =JwQR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----