Re: Music Player in KDE Multimedia Applications
Harald Sitter <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:55:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.multimedia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEc+18FMpCKkoGf0oczM2dktRUo1BS8DwbpX8nP1m2aHapNbtQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Ahoy ahoy, On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Matthieu Gallien <[email protected]> wrote: > I have requested Elisa to be moved to kdereview and at first asked for a move > to extragear. It looks awesome :) > What is your point of view related to Juk, KDE Multimedia and Elisa ? > > I would still like to move in the main module removing the need to do releases > myself. I also know that Camilo Higuita is working on Babe music player and I > do not intend to start any conflict over a choice between both projects. This > is why I believe that extragear is the right choice at the moment. Well, there is nothing that prevents >1 music player from being in kdemultimedia. In fact historically we had multiple players during most of the 3.x series if I recall correctly. Nowadays kdemultimedia and applications at large are really just a way to do joint maintenance and releases, so there is even less worry with regards to application overlap. >> As far as licensing is concerned: that is up to you, LGPL3+ is not a >> preferred license though. >> https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy outlines all >> options. >> Either you go LGPL2.1+ or LGPL2.1+-KDEeV unless there is a very good >> reason why you'd need to use LGPL3+ > > I have a dependency on a AGPL3 library for a SOAP server related to UPnP > support. This is the reason for choosing a v3 license. Ah yes, that makes sense. >> While we are on the topic of licensing, you may want to check out the >> KDE e.V.'s fiduciary licensing agreement >> https://ev.kde.org/rules/fla.php signing this would allow the KDE e.V. >> to manage license changes on your behalf should it become necessary in >> the future. > > I have sent it this week. Hopefully I have managed to send it correctly. Groovy. HS