Re: Seperate 'sets' of mail boxes
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 20 November 2008, Peter777 wrote: > So, at this stage, we are saying that mbox and maildir are 'equally > as fast' as each other ?? I won't make such a claim since it will surely depend on the system, i.e. one might work better on a slow computer while the other might work better on a current laptop (i.e. fast CPU, but slower laptop hard disk). What I do claim is that on a not-too-slow/old computer both, mbox and maildir, are usable without performance penalties. Personally I prefer maildir because it is a bit more robust than mbox. Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkklvhYACgkQGnR+RTDgudjf7gCgq2Acbxc6PDK9YunR3Sfg/ZEX z1cAnj9+zkDN3fGagy1njAAlmppcfj/I =9W0+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----