Re: Seperate 'sets' of mail boxes
Peter777 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 21 November 2008 06:44:21 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Thursday 20 November 2008, Peter777 wrote: > > So, at this stage, we are saying that mbox and maildir are 'equally > > as fast' as each other ?? > > I won't make such a claim since it will surely depend on the system, > i.e. one might work better on a slow computer while the other might > work better on a current laptop (i.e. fast CPU, but slower laptop hard > disk). > > What I do claim is that on a not-too-slow/old computer both, mbox and > maildir, are usable without performance penalties. Personally I prefer > maildir because it is a bit more robust than mbox. Okay, thanks for that. It does seem though, that using mbox, especially for the relatively small sized email box I have (700Mb on total), and considering that a more powerful computer will be used for KMail, that I shouldn't expect any issues/problems with mbox format. I was pleased to hear that you do still use it (mbox) though. :D Peter _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users