Re: IMAP shared mailboxes: issues with kmail?

Wilhelm Meier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Dienstag 20 Januar 2009 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> On Monday 19 January 2009, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > are there any known issues with symlinked-shared-mailboxes and
> > kmail?
> >
> > I use dovecot with virtual users (LDAP), so there are no
> > unix-permissions related
> > problems here: all mailboxes are owned by the local user vmail.
> >
> > Each user maildir has some symlinks to shared mailboxes. This
> > works fine if I use squirrelmail as a MUA.
> >
> > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a mail into
> > the shared-folder, the other users are seeing this new mail
> > almost immediately. But if I delete(!) a mail from the
> > shared-folder, the list of the other kmails remains untouch.
> > Refreshing does nothing. I have to close kmail and restart.
> >
> > Is this related to some sort of wrong config of the shared
> > mailboxes or is this a (known) dovecot <-> kmail problem?
>
> KMail does not watch its folder storage for changes. So it is by
> design (we wanted to keep it simple) that a running KMail does not
> notice all changes done by other processes.

If I turn on "auto-expunge=true" the mail-files in the MDA-storage 
(MDA=dovecot) are deleted, but only if I select the INBOX in KMail 
instance which did the deletion. In this case the other KMails 
instance see the changes if they refresh the list.

This would be fine, if I hadn't select the INDOX. It would be better 
if the expunging takes place immediately or after a timeout / 
refresh-timeval.

-- 
Wilhelm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.