Re: How to know if the current build is using Akonadi?
Kevin Krammer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 02 February 2009, Caleb Cushing wrote: > On Monday 29 December 2008 14:11:33 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > The PIM applications coming with KDE 4.1.x do not use Akonadi. > > Starting > > > with KDE 4.2 (more precisely, KDE 4.2 Beta 1) the address books, > > calendars and todo lists will be handled by Akonadi unless the > > automatic migration is disabled. > > but is there any way to check this? I'm curious to know if the > migration > actually happened since I had trouble getting akonadi runnng at > first. We decided to disable parts of the migration due to difficulties reported during the test phase. Akonadi is started and gets access to the same data the applications are using, but applications like KAddressBook or KOrganizer still use the traditional form of access. Applications like KPilot have already been ported and are using Akonadi. Since we changed the scope of automatic migration between RC1 and the 4.2 release, people with beta or RC setup will also have the client plugins enabled. They can switch back to the traditional plugins since they have only been deactivated, not removed. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBJht2YnKMhG6pzZJIRAuaMAJ0Wb4EfHBB8iKSbjk815+NPj4fBBACfWBrZ JR1fTrAhuR3GMnfuUer3/RM= =ee4M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----