Re: Character encoding in KMail

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:26:11 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:02:30 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009, phep wrote:
> > > > > Anne Wilson a écrit :
> > > > > > A new development for me is that when I reply to some
> > > > > > messages I get a warning about characters that can not be
> > > > > > displayed, and asked whether to drop the characters or
> > > > > > change the encoding.  I have looked over the messages in
> > > > > > question and don't see anything unusual about them.  Can
> > > > > > anyone tell me more about this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can see the use where there are obvious character
> > > > > > problems, even though I can't recognise the problem with
> > > > > > regard to Kishore's messages to [email protected] which is
> > > > > > where the problem is now showing up.
> > > > >
> > > > > This probably happens when you reply to messages which are in
> > > > > a different encoding from your's and you quote all or part of
> > > > > them.
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g. you receive a ISO-8859-X encoded message and you reply
> > > > > to it with your default UTF-8. What KMail asks you then is
> > > > > probably what to do whith the non-ascci characters of the
> > > > > quoted message : convert them to UTF-8 so that your message
> > > > > shall keep coherent (albeit converting the original quoted
> > > > > charcaters) or else ... not displaying those non-ascii
> > > > > ISO-8859-X characters since there can't be, logically, 2
> > > > > distinct charsets in the same piece of code !
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that this is just a guess, Ingo will probably correct
> > > > > ;-)
> > > >
> > > > AFAIK, KMail will not ask you if there's an encoding in the
> > > > list of preferred encodings (under Composer/Charset in the
> > > > settings dialog) which is a superset of the encoding used for
> > > > the received message. It is advisable to put utf-8 into the
> > > > list of preferred encodings because utf-8 is a superset of all
> > > > encodings. I think by default the list consists of two
> > > > encodings: your local encoding and utf-8.
> > >
> > > My local encoding is utf-8, so that should be straight-forward.
> > >
> > > > Kishore's first reply in the "What happened to 'Find in
> > > > message'?" thread contains the character 0xA0 (in hex notation)
> > > > in the quote of Anne's message. I have no idea why KMail seems
> > > > to have replaced the two space characters in "[...] the same
> > > > job.  Was [...]" with a space followed by 0xA0. Could be a bug.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > BTW, using KMail 1.9.10, I didn't get an encoding message when
> > > > replying to Kishore's message and the 0xA0 did end up correctly
> > > > in my reply. OTOH, in Anne's reply the 0xA0 was replaced by a
> > > > '?' (question mark). I'll retry with KMail 1.11 when I have
> > > > finally switched to KDE 4.2.
> > >
> > > I've never seen these encoding messages until today.  I've got a
> > > total blank on where general encodings are set - I though it was
> > > Region & Language - but I'm pretty certain I set utf-8.  All the
> > > same, I'd like to check it, if I can find it.
> >
> > In KMail 1.9.10 it's in Composer/Charset in the settings dialog.
> > Obviously, those encodings are KMail specific.
>
> Yes, I know about them - but I thought that there was another place
> that I set encodings.  Perhaps not.  Anyway, that's set to
> auto-detect,  Do you recommend changing it to utf-8?

I don't think we are talking about the same thing. I'm talking about the 
Charset page of the Composer settings in KMail's configuration dialog. 
There is no "auto-detect" there (in KDE 3.5 anyway).


Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkmIwA0ACgkQGnR+RTDgudhMPQCeJyRE6KdxqEg4wlVTHlkJxr+f
F8UAoL8gWI+3Wdo4ZwT4kszcDh+fmfrY
=Gwsm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.