Re: Still having encoding problems
Anne Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 21:05:20 phep wrote: > > As a matter of fact, their message is quite consistent and not faulty at > all since they do use ISO-8859-1 as advertised. > It still isn't the best choice. For their market, 8859-15 would have been better. > If there is one message to pass them, then, that should be asking them > to use UTF-8 from now on. I'm really longing for the time when those > ISO-8859, JIS, ... will be dead and burried! > I have tried a gentle prompt, that utf-8 is better as an international charset. We'll see if I get any response. Anne _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmTTScACgkQbMErw/n0TZp3TwCeLSc+aQMvNqaaeMx8i7WJBu9y GVEAn2uCnm/sFHb9A9xkKy+O/wtRoxNG =qZrz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----