Re: Still having encoding problems
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 11 February 2009 21:05:20 phep wrote: > > As a matter of fact, their message is quite consistent and not > > faulty at all since they do use ISO-8859-1 as advertised. > > It still isn't the best choice. For their market, 8859-15 would have > been better. Except that ¼, ½ and ¾ does not exist in ISO-8859-15. > > If there is one message to pass them, then, that should be asking > > them to use UTF-8 from now on. I'm really longing for the time when > > those ISO-8859, JIS, ... will be dead and burried! > > I have tried a gentle prompt, that utf-8 is better as an > international charset. We'll see if I get any response. With utf-8 they'd get the best of both charsets: ¼, ½ and ¾ from ISO-8859-1 and € from ISO-8859-15 Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmTXy0ACgkQGnR+RTDgudgRrQCgxqTaM6lFDUT+GsOHUvgIwiQs YpEAnR2XDXDyYQil6fkJzG88gzIkhHAw =gB8a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----